Mazda CX-5 Forums

General Category => Car insurance => Topic started by: Gel on April 18, 2019, 06:20:36 pm

Title: AVIVA Requirement
Post by: Gel on April 18, 2019, 06:20:36 pm
In process of getting some ins. quotes for my upcoming CX-5 (2.0L Petrol GT);
AVIVA on line quote finished with a message they couldn't proceed and I had to call in.
This I did after interminable automated dribble before you get through to a person, who advised they would only insure my new purchase if I had a tracker fitted, and minimum £500 excess.

I'll keep looking ;D
Title: Re: AVIVA Requirement
Post by: dunhill1984 on April 18, 2019, 11:07:42 pm
It seams Aviva is aware of your interest in speed camara warnings- hence the extra excess  lol
Title: Re: AVIVA Requirement
Post by: ceegee on May 27, 2019, 03:23:51 pm
Try LV= I am currently paying £315 pa for a 2016 sport nav auto AWD, however I do get a discount for having 2 cars  and a pension with them
Title: Re: AVIVA Requirement
Post by: steve101 on May 27, 2019, 08:24:23 pm
Am I the only one using Saga? For my CX5 I paid £220.00 with £400 excess.
Title: Re: AVIVA Requirement
Post by: Gel on May 28, 2019, 10:30:43 am
AA £206.53, with NCB protection.
And some cashback due on this too :)
£300 excess. (Windscreen £75).
Title: Re: AVIVA Requirement
Post by: Nickg on June 12, 2019, 03:06:21 pm
Our CX5 (2015 Sport Nav Auto) renewal from Direct Line is £420.00 up from last year when it was £297.00!!! That's not just cheeky but down right rude. They clearly don't want our business and they won't get it.

Lancaster Insurance want £344.00 (I insure my MX5 with them)
LV want £350.00 with the same add ons that we have with Direct Line (Legal and Hire car). It's £319 as a bare policy.

We were with Saga for years and years but a year ago they too got very greedy for existing customers - don't they all I'm sorry to say.

From all the above it looks like I'll be trying the AA next.
Sadly gone are the days when you went to your local broker and left satisfied.

Has anyone  any other suggestions?
Cheers
Nick
Title: Re: AVIVA Requirement
Post by: Gel on June 12, 2019, 04:11:34 pm
I too went with AA-£300 excess @ £206.53 ;D
Introductory discount for first year, so we'll wait to see what it is
in 2020.
Title: Re: AVIVA Requirement
Post by: Nickg on June 12, 2019, 06:50:05 pm
I too went with AA-£300 excess @ £206.53 ;D
Introductory discount for first year, so we'll wait to see what it is
in 2020.
My AA quote is £323.  So I have a feeling that your next year quote will be a lot higher. I hope for your sake that it is not higher but my wife and I are ideal insurance candidates (location, no commuting, not too many miles a year etc etc). As I see it there is only age against us as we are in our seventies.

LV is the winner at £319, AA second at £323, Lancaster £344 and Direct Line bringing up the rear  £381. (After haggling down from £420).

Thank you one and all for all the prices and companies you have given this thread.

Cheers
Nick
Title: Re: AVIVA Requirement
Post by: Gel on June 12, 2019, 08:33:38 pm
I went through GO COMPARE, so am due some cashback in due course too.
Debenham's Insurance was cheapest, but that group has financial woes, so avoided.
Title: Re: AVIVA Requirement
Post by: dunhill1984 on June 14, 2019, 05:05:21 pm
I found NFU to have the best policy cover/price combination out there plus they have local ofiices and direct central call centre(uk). i have been with them 3 yrs now and the premium goes DOWN every time due to loyalty bonus(plus being a mutual it plows back all profits into the business and no you dont have to be a farmer lol.
my premium is for 8k miles NO excess at all for 2 drivers is £296
Title: Re: AVIVA Requirement
Post by: singingsnapper on June 16, 2019, 02:18:19 pm
I went through GO COMPARE, so am due some cashback in due course too.
Debenham's Insurance was cheapest, but that group has financial woes, so avoided.

Debenhams won't be providing the insurance though.  It is just a front for an actual insurance company.  Admiral etc are all just brokers insurance is all provided by underwriters.