xtrailman, am I being unduly sensitive or is it the case that although you often have really very useful comments and experience to share re CX5 ownership, a lot of the time they basically boil down to "it still isn't as good as my trusty old Nissan used to be"?
If not then I apologise. But if so, then why do persist with your Mazda when other cars are available?
Yes you are being over sensitive.
I tell it as it is, and Mazda of all the Japanese cars I've had has been the most problematic.
Not just my first CX-5 but both have had issues, they just don't come close to both xtrails I've owned, the last Xtrail was 100% reliable with the only niggle being a vibrating rear view mirror, sorted diy with a after market clip on mirror.
The car had BT which just worked, a nav that just worked, a reversing camera that just worked, and was better than the first cx-5 one I had. It didn't have USB, but it did have a six CD changer which was all I needed.
What the new Xtrail has is a weedy engine, its also lost its practical box shape, so the new car is no good to me.
The Cx-5 has a great engine for towing, even though it has earned a reputation for being problematic, unreliable.
My next car will not be a Mazda, far too many owner issues, instead I may look at my first Korean car, or even a BMW.
At present my BT issues are sorted, after 5 trips to the dealer, but the brakes still make an awful squeak on braking, and the night vision on the reversing camera is dire compared to both the Xtrail and my last cx-5.
Both faults different dealers say don't exist, really even the wife finds the brake noise embarrassing, but three times now different dealers say the brakes are ok, as they do with the reverse camera night image.
I also find the headlight low beam cut off too low, my last Xtrail dip was great, other owners have reported the same, dealer says its ok.
From a recent cx-5 owner posted on caravan talk this week.
"So... The saga continues. The CX-5 was towed in the dealer on Monday (again).. Got a phone call yesterday from dealer that they are waiting for a new turbo. Less than 50k miles? Surely that's not good."